Thursday, April 5, 2012
Ya gotta read Lloyd!
Democrats Responsible For Black Culture of Anger
By Lloyd Marcus
FBI and U.S. Justice Dept. statistics confirm that blacks are 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against whites than whites are to commit violence against blacks. Ninety percent of the victims of race crimes are white.
What are the consequences of the Democratic Party keeping black Americans stewing in their well-crafted culture of anger? Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery. Blacks are three times more likely to use a handgun and twice as likely to use a knife. Forty-five percent of black crime is against whites, 43 percent against other blacks, and 10 percent against Hispanics. Who can deny that black criminals are angry at whites and fellow blacks? Blacks are seven times more likely to end up in prison.
Read more:
MUST READ: A negative for us...
The Positivist President?By Robert Harkins
...That said, the president's criticism of the Supreme Court justices does find support in the political doctrine of "Positivism." The positivist theory, developed in Germany following the First World War, holds that a natural law, or the rule of law, simply does not exist. The idea that men are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights is therefore patently absurd.
"In short, every single tenet of the traditional conception of the rule of law is represented as a metaphysical superstition. ... The law by definition consists exclusively of deliberate commands of a human will." The legislature is not bound by precedent, by custom or tradition, or by considerations of justice. As apparently vulgar and irrational as is the positivist theory, Hitler used it to leverage the Nazi Party first to power and then to totalitarian power [1].
"In short, every single tenet of the traditional conception of the rule of law is represented as a metaphysical superstition. ... The law by definition consists exclusively of deliberate commands of a human will." The legislature is not bound by precedent, by custom or tradition, or by considerations of justice. As apparently vulgar and irrational as is the positivist theory, Hitler used it to leverage the Nazi Party first to power and then to totalitarian power [1].
In his analysis of the positivist theory, F.A. Hayek writes:
It was consequently here that the ideal of the rule of law was first deprived of real content. The substantive conception of the Rechtsstaat, [a state bound by the rule of law]; which required that the rules of law possess definite properties, was displaced by a purely formal concept which required merely that all action of the state be authorized by the legislature.
In short, a "law" was that which merely stated that whatever a certain authority did should be legal. The problem thus became one of mere legality. By the turn of the century it had become accepted doctrine that the "individualist" ideal of the substantive Rechtsstaat was a thing of the past, "vanquished by the creative powers of national and social ideas. ... This new formulation, known as the "pure theory of law" ... signaled the definite eclipse of all traditions of limited government. [2]
Read more:
Is Obama going to be the next one?
Only One President Has Ever Ignored a SCOTUS Order
By Matthew S. Harrison
Allow me to remind the American people of the only US President who violated a SCOTUS order, and the despicable outcome of his actions.
It was 1830, and Andrew Jackson, the founder of the Democratic Party, had signed the "Indian Removal Act of 1830." The Democrats were pretty rattled that the heathens had prospered, especially the "Five Civilized Tribes." The Trail Of Tears it was dubbed, for after the Supreme Court had ordered Jackson to stand down, the Army marched in and literally stole everything the "Five Civilized Tribes" had built (These tribes were the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muscogee-Creek, and Seminole).
Between 1831 and 1839, the Army had forced nearly 50,000 Indians to march west, many dying along the way. But in 1831, SCOTUS ruled on behalf of the Cherokee Nation, in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia. Mr. Jackson became the only President to ignore a SCOTUS order, and the deaths of thousands of Cherokees followed. The ruination of their businesses, culture, and theft of their lands was the outcome. Those lands were ostensibly given to whites, while the Cherokees and the four other tribes were forcibly marched west to uncharted territory and left to die.
Mr. Jackson was succeeded by another Democrat, Martin VanBuren, who had been Jackson's Secretary of State. He followed in his predecessor's footsteps and made sure that the slaughter and theft of land, businesses, and pride continued long after Mr. Jackson got the ball rolling.
Oddly, the primary reason the Cherokees were forced out was the discovery of Gold in Georgia-and the leadership in Georgia, who followed the newly formed Democratic Party, couldn't have uppity dark skinned people gaining more strength and power than they already had, with their burgeoning businesses, and production of grains, textiles, and more. Among the Five Civilized Tribes, tens of thousands were placed in what we today know as concentration camps and/or marched from Florida, the Carolinas, Georgia, Louisiana, and other areas not yet states, to places west that would become "reservations." This from the party who fought tooth and nail later against the abolition of slavery and who later brought us the KKK,
The reason we have a Government with three divisions, all with equal power under the law is simple; it is a system of checks and balances, to ensure that things like the Trail Of Tears don't occur ever again. Odd how this current president has violated the Constitution continually without serious friction from Congress or SCOTUS -- and now that there is potential friction, his dander is up. Let's hope SCOTUS isn't ignored by this President, as we all know the potential outcome when that happens. Obama's threat leveled at SCOTUS is in line with the founder of his party, and their longstanding belief that they are above the Constitution, and that the division of powers, as outlined in the Constitution of The United States of America.
Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/04/only_one_president_has_ever_ignored_a_scotus_order.html#ixzz1r9iKfHAe
(Ribbet!)
Of course, Obama doesn't have a grudge against the Cherokees, Choctaws, Seminoles etc. He doesn't have a grudge against Mexicans, African-Americans, Canadians, Hondurans, Columbians, Pakistanis, East Indians, Muslims, Indonesians, Maylays, Iranians, Russians or Chinese etc. here--nor especially should he... However, we need to take heed of the people here in America that he does hate: white people, white wealthy people, white Republican people. If there's going to be another tragedy, that's where I'd put my money.
Allow me to remind the American people of the only US President who violated a SCOTUS order, and the despicable outcome of his actions.
It was 1830, and Andrew Jackson, the founder of the Democratic Party, had signed the "Indian Removal Act of 1830." The Democrats were pretty rattled that the heathens had prospered, especially the "Five Civilized Tribes." The Trail Of Tears it was dubbed, for after the Supreme Court had ordered Jackson to stand down, the Army marched in and literally stole everything the "Five Civilized Tribes" had built (These tribes were the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muscogee-Creek, and Seminole).
Between 1831 and 1839, the Army had forced nearly 50,000 Indians to march west, many dying along the way. But in 1831, SCOTUS ruled on behalf of the Cherokee Nation, in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia. Mr. Jackson became the only President to ignore a SCOTUS order, and the deaths of thousands of Cherokees followed. The ruination of their businesses, culture, and theft of their lands was the outcome. Those lands were ostensibly given to whites, while the Cherokees and the four other tribes were forcibly marched west to uncharted territory and left to die.
Mr. Jackson was succeeded by another Democrat, Martin VanBuren, who had been Jackson's Secretary of State. He followed in his predecessor's footsteps and made sure that the slaughter and theft of land, businesses, and pride continued long after Mr. Jackson got the ball rolling.
Oddly, the primary reason the Cherokees were forced out was the discovery of Gold in Georgia-and the leadership in Georgia, who followed the newly formed Democratic Party, couldn't have uppity dark skinned people gaining more strength and power than they already had, with their burgeoning businesses, and production of grains, textiles, and more. Among the Five Civilized Tribes, tens of thousands were placed in what we today know as concentration camps and/or marched from Florida, the Carolinas, Georgia, Louisiana, and other areas not yet states, to places west that would become "reservations." This from the party who fought tooth and nail later against the abolition of slavery and who later brought us the KKK,
The reason we have a Government with three divisions, all with equal power under the law is simple; it is a system of checks and balances, to ensure that things like the Trail Of Tears don't occur ever again. Odd how this current president has violated the Constitution continually without serious friction from Congress or SCOTUS -- and now that there is potential friction, his dander is up. Let's hope SCOTUS isn't ignored by this President, as we all know the potential outcome when that happens. Obama's threat leveled at SCOTUS is in line with the founder of his party, and their longstanding belief that they are above the Constitution, and that the division of powers, as outlined in the Constitution of The United States of America.
Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/04/only_one_president_has_ever_ignored_a_scotus_order.html#ixzz1r9iKfHAe
(Ribbet!)
Of course, Obama doesn't have a grudge against the Cherokees, Choctaws, Seminoles etc. He doesn't have a grudge against Mexicans, African-Americans, Canadians, Hondurans, Columbians, Pakistanis, East Indians, Muslims, Indonesians, Maylays, Iranians, Russians or Chinese etc. here--nor especially should he... However, we need to take heed of the people here in America that he does hate: white people, white wealthy people, white Republican people. If there's going to be another tragedy, that's where I'd put my money.
Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Monday, April 2, 2012
Sunday, April 1, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
