Thursday, September 1, 2011

"It is for your sake" that we go to Martha's Vineyard, eat Kobe beef, fly in separate jets...

Barack Obama, Man of the People

By Steve McCann

The portrait of Barack Obama's presidency is that of an egocentric -- not only incapable of leadership, but someone who views the office as a vehicle for the satisfaction of his delusion that the world not only owes him a living, but a sumptuous one.

A trait common to many who espouse socialism, inclusive of dictators and Democrats, is an insatiable appetite for self-indulgence.  While those on the conservative side of the political spectrum are often accused of hypocrisy when it comes to matters of sex and morality, those on the left are equally guilty, if not more so, in matters of money, paying taxes, and lifestyle.

Regardless of the public image they may convey, Barack Obama and his wife never fail to take full advantage of a lifestyle that would be the envy of any modern-day monarch while the bulk of the American populace struggles to afford life's necessities.

He is but another in a long line of those who promote socialism and proclaim to be "of the people" with only the interests of the citizens at heart -- as they duplicitously pursue a personal agenda.   

Beyond the unquestioned belief by those on the left that they are the most capable, thus superior and pre-ordained to govern the masses, the traits most common to the vast majority of self-described "progressives" in positions of power are jealousy, greed, and massively inflated delusions of entitlement...


This is exactly why they do it--and why they think they are entitled. Not just Zippy and Michelle--but Communists everywhere, for all time. And it's exactly why communism will never work.

Oh sure, they say socialism/communism is 'fairer'--that everyone will have the same--but it's not true. Every single Mao Tse Tung, Stalin, Pol Pot, Hugo Chavez, Nicolae and Elena Ceausescu, Fidel Castro etc. has always lived much, much better than the 'proletariat' around them--and they always intended to.

You'll never see them standing in any breadline they caused, wearing lousy shoes, or told how many children to have. They won't suffer their own revolution-made health care, give up their vacations, eat meat only once a week, or send their kids to government schools. No, they always have the expectation of something quite different for themselves--as the Obamas most certainly do.

That's why it's particularly galling the way Michelle feigns 'tiredness', speaks of Barack's 'gray hairs', hints at their self-sacrifice, and says they've 'pledged their whole working lives for the good of America'; this is just a calculated move to keep their hands close to our pockets and justify their entitlement. I mean, they can't have us complain. They can't get us 'riled up'--and we'll be too 'Minnesota nice' to object until it's too late (and maybe they'll get lucky and they'll have our guns by then). The gravy train runs only as long as we let it, or until they ruin our economy and they've milked the cow quite dry.

Michelle had better be careful, though... a bullet in the head, in a unused soccer field, frequently awaits those who don't use their people well. For those that do, heaps of skulls, millions dead, and all the wasted good things America has to offer has been--and will be--the evil legacy of this failed system, and these awful people. Some are deluded that things will turn out differently. And some, like Barack and Michelle, well, I think they just don't care.

This is just White Wally World anyway, right? And that's not their world at all.

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Obama’s race war begins:

Obama’s Ineligibility: Prepare to Defend America

By Lawrence Sellin

The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) is out there again in full race-baiting mode.

Having failed to drum up support for Barack Obama in the form of racial hatred by playing the victim card in the infamous Tea Party “N-Word” incident that didn’t happen, the CBC is now promoting racial violence against the Tea Party.

Members of the CBC are traveling the country inciting racist hatred, telling audiences that the Tea Party “wants to lynch blacks.”

One reader commented:

“Without question the CBC has declared war on the Tea Party which is also known as the American people who are sick and tired of having their wallets raided by the unproductive and the ungrateful and their political champions who principally are the Democratic Party. The CBC’s message to the American people, “Sit down, shut up, and pay up.” And they are mighty unhappy that the payers don’t want to be paying anymore.”

The action by the CBC is part of Obama’s campaign strategy for the 2012 election, but there is more.

By threatening race riots, Obama has intimidated the entire US Government from questioning his Constitutional eligibility for the Presidency and investigating his forged birth certificate and Selective Service registration and his stolen Social Security Number*.

The race riot strategy has worked so well keeping him in office, Obama intends to exploit that threat to get himself re-elected.

The recent racially-motivated flash mob attacks on non-black US citizens have provided dry runs for 2012 and have served as a warning to anyone considering opposing the empty suit now occupying the Oval Office.

Police in West Allis, Wisconsin, say attacks by black teenagers on white people outside the gates of the Wisconsin State Fair on August 4th were racially motivated and should be prosecuted as hate crimes.

The latest cyclist attack in St. Louis, Missouri, occurred on August 25th near the Missouri Botanical Garden where a group of 10 to 15 African-American teens charged and attacked Cheech Ramirez.

According to Ramirez:

“They weren’t really interested in robbing me. It just seemed like they wanted to beat me up.”

The CBC must be very pleased with the increase in racial violence.The race war strategy is evil genius with few drawbacks for Obama.Racial thugs can be combined with union thugs, who have already been successfully deployed against peaceful Tea Party activists.

Threats of racial violence will continue to prevent Congressional investigations of Obama’s ineligibility and crimes.

If ordinary Americans retaliate against his campaign of violence, Obama can declare martial law and cancel the 2012 election.

If Obama loses in 2012, he will try to use a race war to bring America down with him.

It is clear that we have no political leaders willing to state the truth openly, that Obama is a usurper and a criminal.

They would all rather play it safe and continue the charade that we have an honest government accountable to the people instead of the reality of a corrupt oligarchy.

The irony is that any politician, willing to take an unambiguous stand against Obama’s illegal and criminal Presidency, would be a shoe-in as his replacement.

Unfortunately, instead of helping the American people uphold the Constitution and the rule of law, the political-media complex has protected Obama and cut off every avenue to challenge him legally.

The remaining question is: will the American people continue to tolerate flagrant government corruption and slouch towards Armageddon?

I smell rebellion in the air.

* Judge rules on Obama's Social Security Number

* The Racial Violence that Dare Not Speak Its Name

So, the election is being primed to play out like a walk home from the Wisconsin State Fair? 'Vote for Obama, or look what we'll do to you!'? I guess this is just a taste of what's to come. I'd like to not be so paranoid about this, but there's been plenty of black-on-white violence already to underline the point.
We good conservatives had better realize what's happening and why, and nip it in the bud, or our cities will burn and our people will die. I have absolutely no respect for Carson and his ilk,  fellow House Reps. Maxine Waters, and Frederica Wilson--and newsy Al Sharpton on MSNBC--etc. who can't manage to get a voice without pandering to the lowest common denominator.  For wanting so much legitimacy and 'respec'', they set a low, low bar for getting it.

"Barack was straight"???

Biden: Obama Has ‘Backbone Like a Ramrod’

By Devin Dwyer

Republican presidential contenders have hammered President Obama this week as a cautious and ineffectual world leader, insisting that he lacks — in the words of Michele Bachmann — a “titanium spine.”

But Vice President Joe Biden proved Tuesday he won’t let the attacks go unanswered, telling a crowd of campaign donors in Tulsa, Okla., that the president has “a backbone like a ramrod.”

“Presidential elections are about strength and character,” Biden said, according to press pool reports. “It’s the one race that’s measured different than any other in American politics. It comes down, in relative terms, to has the most strength and the most character.

“People knew Barack was really bright, they knew Barack was straight, they knew Barack was a different kind of politician. What they didn’t know was just how strong he was,” he said. “Republicans spent a lot of time trying to tag him as a follower, not a leader. Well, he’s put that to bed.”

Biden cited Obama’s gutsy decision to order a covert raid on Osama bin Laden’s Pakistani compound as proof the president is a strong commander in chief. And he said Obama’s role in the debt ceiling debate was equally strong, brokering a deal with Republican leadership that ultimately fell to Tea Party intransigence.

“This is going to be the clearest-cut election,” Biden said. “This is going to be the clearest choice of where we want to be. These guys have laid it out where they want us to be. And we’re going to debate it. We’re not going to debate just in terms of, you know, a 30-second political ad. Paul Ryan laid out their budget. Their budget, over the next decade, eviscerates — eliminates — Medicare. They say it’s a voucher system. I call that eliminating it.”

Biden made the remarks at a private fundraiser at the Tulsa home of Dr. Stephen Adelson. Donations benefitted the Obama Victory Fund, a joint account that funnels money to Obama’s reelection campaign and the Democratic National Committee.


I get so discouraged when I read something like this. I mean, we all know Biden's as clueless as the day is long... but does he have to keep proving it so relentlessly?  He sounds so fatuous and in the tank for Barky--a real True Believer! It's bad enough that the world has to know what stupid leadership we have; when they hear Biden at it, as well, they must just laugh themselves into anemia (when they're not plotting to take us down...)

And what was that crack about Barack being 'straight'? Interesting choice of words--I guess 'clean' and 'articulate' have run their course... But 'straight'? When both Zippy and Rahm have a lifetime membership at Chicago's premier gay bathhouse?? When there's been rumors for years???

I think I'm not the only one who wishes Joe would just shut up! LOL!

Monday, August 29, 2011

Good Morning!

Prayers This Morning!

Prayers this morning to our dear friend Hollyhock ('Hooly'), and her family with Baby Celeste. May you find peace and healing in G*d, and friendship and love from us, forever ;-)

Continuing prayers for Jen and her wonderful husband Gerry, Gram and her friend in Florida, and all my kind readers here.
You, 'Lucky Lurkers'--put on the coffee!

Zero + Zero = 0

Early Obama Letter Confirms Inability to Write

By Jack Cashill

On November 16, 1990, Barack Obama, then president of the Harvard Law Review, published a letter in the Harvard Law Record, an independent Harvard Law School newspaper, championing affirmative action.

Although a paragraph from this letter was excerpted in David Remnick's biography of Obama, The Bridge, I had not seen the letter in its entirety before this week.  Not surprisingly, it confirms everything I know about Barack Obama, the writer and thinker.

Obama was prompted to write by an earlier letter from a Mr. Jim Chen that criticized Harvard Law Review's affirmative action policies.  Specifically, Chen had argued that affirmative action stigmatized its presumed beneficiaries.

The response is classic Obama: patronizing, dishonest, syntactically muddled, and grammatically challenged.  In the very first sentence Obama leads with his signature failing, one on full display in his earlier published work: his inability to make subject and predicate agree.

"Since the merits of the Law Review's selection policy has been the subject of commentary for the last three issues," wrote Obama, "I'd like to take the time to clarify exactly how our selection process works."

If Obama were as smart as a fifth-grader, he would know, of course, that "merits ... have."  Were there such a thing as a literary Darwin Award, Obama could have won it on this on one sentence alone.  He had vindicated Chen in his first ten words...